The parties are advised to chill.
Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 894, 908 (9th Cir. 2002)

Monday, April 14, 2003
Silicon Valley Concert

[Disclaimer - this one is not news-related in any way. Also, no links. I know, it's the Cardinal Sin of Blogging, but too bad. - Tony]

The envelope lay on the dining room table.

I picked it up, opened it, and looked inside.

"April 11. San Jose Performing Arts Center." Sweet!

My roommate walked in, smiling. "What is it?" he asked.

"Tickets to go see Tori Amos in concert," I replied, grinning.

His smile didn't change at all, but I could sense the zinger coming on.

"Dude," he demanded, "what happened to your balls? That music's for chicks!"

I raised my hand up, to fend off the verbal jab. "Hey, it's good music!" I protested. I glanced down involuntarily, then stopped myself. Yup, still there. What was I expecting?

So off I went, with a work buddy of mine, down to San Jose. Unlike the claustrophobic, one-way confines of downtown San Francisco, downtown San Jose is characterized by broad avenues, and relatively low, spaced-apart buildings. In the early twilight, the streets were surprisingly empty. San Jose on a Friday night. Go figure.

Arriving at the Performing Arts Center, booths and vans from two competing radio stations were parked next to each other. Not many people approached the booths, leaving them to stand in somewhat forlorn isolation.

The demographics of the crowd surprised me. There were the usual, slightly depressed-looking alt-rock types, of course. But the crowd also ranged from high school students to yuppies in polo shirts to people in late middle-age. Piercings and tattoos abounded. In addition, there were quite a few people sporting mohawks, at a higher per capita distribution than I normally see. Well, outside of Haight-Ashbury and Berkeley, natch.

Rhett Miller came on first. He moved in a disjointed sort of way, as if his limbs were independently controlled. Very entertaining. At one point, his lower arm rotated about the elbow in perfect circles, while playing the guitar.

Then, the main event. The set was rather simple. A cutout of a mountain range formed the lower background. Behind it, an off-white sheet extended upwards. There was a large design on it, that was difficult to make out, almost as if a watermark had been imprinted into the sheet. The design turned out to be a heart-shaped face, with accents suggesting a harlequin. Slender, leafy branches took the place of hair. The overall effect was like some anthropomorphic sun, smiling benignly down at the performers.

Tori Amos walked onstage, to tremendous applause. The concert consisted of just her, a bass player, and a drummer. A concert piano had been set for her at front center stage. Behind her was something that looked, in the semi-darkness, like a side view of a large gas grill. It turned out to be an electronic keyboard setup. Oops.

The performance, needless to say, was fantastic. Her voice was clear, strong, and hit high notes effortlessly, carrying the audience along. Behind me, one mohawk-sporting gal kept me vastly entertained by shouting out at various times:

"You're f*cking beautiful!"

"I love you"

"You're a perfect fairy and I want to marry you!"

After a while, I didn't hear any exclamations from Mohawk Girl. I looked back. Her seat was empty. Kicked out? Overcome by emotion? I don't know, but her absence left a soundless void in that area. Or so it seemed.

She didn't really talk to the audience, with the exception of an anecdote about her daughter and a candy necklace.

That was all right; the music was more than enough.


Posted 4:49 PM by Tony

Thursday, April 10, 2003
Flag Follies

Sometimes, there's just no pleasing people.

I've been looking through the al-Jazeera web page, as I find the parallax view of events interesting. When the Hussein statue went down yesterday, it did so with the help of some Marines. One of them, Corporal Edward Chin, intially covered Hussein's face with an American flag, later replacing it with an Iraqi flag:


Corporal Edward Chin, 3rd Battalion, 4th Marine Regiment, from New York
(from NY Times/AP)


Al-Jazeera got a little worked up, interpreting the gesture as a symbol of American domination:

One obvious question: During live coverage, viewers saw a US soldier drape over the face of Hussein a US flag, which was quickly removed and replaced with an Iraqi flag.

Commanders know that the displaying the US flag suggests occupation and domination, not liberation. NBC's Tom Brokaw reported that the Arab network Al Jazeera was "making a big deal" out of the incident with the American flag, implying that US television would -- and should -- downplay that part of the scene. Which choice tells the more complete truth?

Oddly enough, the piece was written by Robert Jensen, a University of Texas journalism professor.

Jensen may be reading a little too much into the incident. Moreover, that particular flag stood for something other than American occupation:
It was, by any measure, an astonishing coincidence. As the biggest statue of Saddam Hussein in Baghdad was pulled down "spontaneously" in front of the world's media, the Stars and Stripes which flew on the Pentagon on 11 September was at hand to be draped over its face.

The US army denied that the toppling of the 20ft edifice by a tank tower was stage-managed. It was a coincidence, they said, that Lt Tim McLaughlin, the keeper of that flag, happened to be present.

And, it has to be noted, the commander of the US marines who completed the capture of Baghdad did express concern at the time that the use of the Stars and Stripes smacked of triumphalism. It was later changed to an Iraqi flag. But not before acres of TV footage had been shot.

Yesterday, the US army banned any display of the flag on vehicles, buildings, statues and command posts, halting its display almost everywhere but the US embassy in Baghdad.

See also, here.

I really doubt I'll see that in the Chronicle's coverage, though.


Posted 7:12 PM by Tony


Why Not?

I thought this was interesting:



Samantha Sheppard, British 2d Light Tank Regiment, Basra, April 8, 2003
(via Reuters/Yahoo)


So why not have women in ground combat arms? InstaPundit points out instances of women serving as combat pilots, and the convoy ambush and the Jessica Lynch episodes demonstrate that women are still at risk while serving in combat support branches.

I think the concept deserves at least a test run. Let's see what happens.

Update:
I was looking for this article on A-10 pilot Kim Campbell (via Susanna at Cut On The Bias), and the photos of her shot up A-10 can be found here.
I'm thinking that the slogan for the war ought to be: You Got Your Ass Kicked By Giiirrrrrls! Let's see how that plays on the Arab Street.


Posted 11:30 AM by Tony


Well, Okay Then

Here's a bit from the Washington Post (via The Volokh Conspiracy):

"No, no, no," yelled Shaaban Mohamad, watching television at a Cairo bookstore. "If the U.S. really wanted democracy, they would have taken out just about every Arab leader we have. This is very suspect. The U.S. just wants to protect Israel and wants the riches in the region."
[emphasis added]

Well, I'm game. Next stop, Riyadh!



Posted 8:16 AM by Tony

Wednesday, April 09, 2003
Human Shields, 0; United States Marine Corps, 1

This bit from the SF Chronicle pretty much makes my day:

For the most part, the Marines [entering Baghdad's center] were treated as conquering heroes. Young Iraqis put flowers in the pockets of their body armor. Kids begged for money.

There was a lot of smiling and laughing. One Iraqi gave out high-fives to passing Marines and reporters.

There were some American and European "human shields'' at the rally, people who had come to put themselves in harm's way in hopes of stopping the shooting. They chastised the Marines for attacking Iraq and promoting war.

That angered some of the men. "I didn't bury two of my fellow Marines just so someone like that could call us murderers,'' said one Marine, angry and teary, referring to an Iraqi artillery attack that killed two of his colleagues on Monday. "They died for this country.''

Meanwhile, two Iraqis held up a sheet bearing the message: "Go home Human Shields, you U.S. Wankers.'' [emphasis added]

Would it be too much if I had myself a little chuckle over that?

Update:
Via InstaPundit, here's this:

From Kuwait, which was occupied by Saddam's forces before the 1991 Gulf War, came one of the few statements of unadulterated support. Sheik Sabah Al Ahmed Al Sabah, Kuwait's deputy prime minister and foreign minister, said, "Joy fills our hearts as we see our Iraqi brothers ... express their jubilation at victory."

[...]

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud, looking upset at a news conference, called for a quick end to Iraq's "occupation." In a rare departure from diplomacy, Saud responded to a question about Arab anger toward the United States with: "I don't want to talk about anger if you don't mind today."

Our friends, the Saudis. *snort*

Update 2:
More on the human shield encounter:

When one of the few remaining "human shields" in Baghdad, Uzma Bashir, from Rickmansworth, baited the troops with shouts of "Yankee murderers", Cpl Ibrahim Rahim exploded: "I scooped up the brains of two young marines ... They died fighting to liberate Iraq. And you stand here insulting them with this shit." He added: "I am a Muslim ... and I know this region. That woman is seriously abusing her right of speech."

That, I think, goes beyond merely "chastising" the Marines.


Posted 3:15 PM by Tony


A Short Message

This one is for International ANSWER, the World Workers Party, Maureen Dowd and other assorted pundits, the human shields, everybody who held screwed up traffic in downtown San Francisco, and people that called me a warmonger:


Saddam Hussein statue in Baghdad's main square just before being torn down
(photo NY Times/AP, Laurent Rebours)


It's funny, how "we're making war on the people of Iraq."


Posted 8:11 AM by Tony

Tuesday, April 08, 2003
Warrior Ethos

As a general principle, I dislike the San Francisco Chronicle. The written quality of its articles rivals that of my junior high school newspaper. The paper actually pays people like Mark Morford and Harley Sorensen to produce venomous spew, the vile of which somehow seems to get transmitted through the display and leaves me wanting to wash my hands. I find it hard to believe that this is the only major newspaper that San Franciscans seem to support.

Why do I keep going back? Because the paper's web site carries a decent AP feed, and not all of its stories are of the servicemen-as-automaton variety:

In one of many small-scale engagements in and around Baghdad on Tuesday, two Marine snipers on a rooftop and others in tanks and Humvees topped with machine guns killed approaching Iraqis one by one throughout the morning, often from hundreds of yards away.

[...]

At one point, a man in a black ski mask with a rifle in the bed of a truck pulled up behind a group of civilians. The snipers said they aimed high to scatter the civilians, then shot him.

As Hamblin and Cpl. Owen Mulder, 21, of Wilmont, Minn., continued to scan under the elevated highway, Marines in Humvees kept watch for suicide bombers.

About 7 a.m., a truck with a machine gun mount -- but no machine gun attached to it -- raced down the highway, and the Marines started firing, using machine guns, grenade launchers and their rifles.

The truck flew into reverse, racing back about 100 yards before stopping. One man opened the a door and fell out. Then another, apparently missing an arm, ran down the highway. Some Marines prepared to shoot, but their commanders stopped them.

"He's wounded, he's no threat to us. Why do you want to kill someone who's wounded?" Kelley asked.

A few minutes later, ambulances arrived to tend to the injured.

A couple of points.

First, training tells.

Second, the story illustrates the comparative restraint with which American forces are prosecuting this war.

And here's an explanation why, again from the Chronicle:

[W]hat distinguishes warriors from murderers is that warriors accept a set of rules governing when and how they kill. They must learn to take only certain lives in certain ways, at certain times and for certain reasons. Otherwise, they become indistinguishable from murderers. Individuals can fight for an objectively bad cause or a corrupt regime and still be warriors. But there can be no honor in any conflict for those who believe they have no moral obligation to restrain their behavior in any way.

Much as I'm reluctant to say it, the Chron is not always Chrap.


Posted 3:05 PM by Tony


Breaking China

My buddy Dawn has taken some flak for being ticked at the ChiCom's response to the SARS crisis.

So if I may, I'd like to say:

I know it's not appropriate for me as an American Oriental person to say that I don't like another "type" of person, but the Chinese government pisses me off.

Thank you, and good night! (Long live rock!)


Posted 2:43 PM by Tony


Trading Yokes?

My high school was founded by priests who fled Hungary during the Soviet crackdown in 1956. I always figured that, as a consequence, they knew what tyranny was about, as did most Eastern Europeans.

The InstaPundit points out an EU Observer article:

One and a half weeks ahead of the EU poll the Hungarian police removed posters portraying a swastika, a red star and the EU emblem. Leaders of the Hungarian EU-critical movement who are believed to have disseminated the placards left their headquarter detained by police.


Far as I'm concerned, InstaPundit left out the best, ironic, part, the title:

Hungarian Police Remove Symbols Of Tyranny



Posted 9:11 AM by Tony


Buffalo Soldiers

I was watching Fox News Channel before going to work. As usual, the war coverage had been going nonstop, and Geraldo was on the air, the dark blue of the darkening desert sky merging into the horizon.

Geraldo was speaking with soldiers from the 4th Infantry Division. I was surprised, because the 4th Infantry Division had been sent to war only recently. Even more surprising was the unit he was with, the 1st Squadron, 10th United States Cavalry.

The 10th Cavalry was one of the all-black regiments formed after the Civil War, and sent west to fight, in turn, the Cheyenne, the Comanche, and the Apaches.

So the Buffalo Soldiers are now on the ground. The number of Dreadlock Rastas among them is, however, unknown.


Posted 8:34 AM by Tony

Monday, April 07, 2003
The Pope On War

The Pope is praying for a quick end to the war.

Don't worry, Your Holiness, our guys are on it.


101st Airborne Division soldiers, Kuwait
(taken March 20, 2003, source ?)


In all seriousness, though, it feels decidedly odd to be directly at odds with the head of one's church. I believe, that in this instance, with this dictator, the Pope chose wrongly.

The Pope has made clear his categorical rejection of war. Addressing a recent conference of military chaplains, he said:

By now, it should be clear to all that the use of war as a means of resolving disputes between States was rejected, even before the UN Charter, by the consciences of the majority of humanity, except in the case of legitimate defence against an aggressor. The vast contemporary movement in favour of peace - which, according to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council, is more than "the simple absence of war" (Gaudium et spes, n. 78) - demonstrates this conviction of people of every continent and culture.

However, I think his argument is weakened by a speech he made in 1992 to the Third International and Interdenominational Conference of Chief Military Chaplains of Europe and North America:

There is another point I wish to make. Peace is a precious and fragile gift which God entrusts to man, to his conscience and to his reason. For you, two equally necessary duties derive from this. The first is the duty to work through the formation of consciences in order to foster an authentic desire for peace. The second duty is to pray constantly for peace, that God will grant this gift to the people of our times. On innumerable occasions I have prayed publicly for peace and appealed for prayers for peace, most recently during the Gulf War and the conflict in Yugoslavia. "With God nothing will be impossible". When human efforts seem doomed to failure, the power of God's Spirit can work deep within people's hearts, to quench hatred and kindle love.

As a doctrinal matter, I'd point out that God works through earthly instruments. As callous as it may sound, prayer sometimes needs a helping hand. Prayer, by itself, did not get Saddam out of Kuwait, nor did it stop the butchery in Yugoslavia; military force did.

I'm incredibly saddened that the Pope has taken the position he has. He has recognized the evil of Auschwitz without acknowledging how its end was brought about.

The Pope may be right that "war is in fact . . . as much a tragedy for the victors as for the vanquished." Sometimes, however, there are no good choices, boiling down to acceptance of one tragedy to forestall a greater tragedy.


Posted 6:03 PM by Tony


Korean Press Regulations

For someone who made a name as a civil rights lawyer, I find it ironic that South Korean President Moo-hyun Roh is attempting to impose new regulations on the press:

Last Thursday, chief spokespersons from all government branches convened and decided to introduce a new media policy, requiring that reporters appeal to relevant authorities for authorization to interview government officials.

The president focused his criticism on certain newspaper companies and their incessant attacks on his predecessor, former President Kim Dae-jung, which have since been redirected at him.

In response to Roh's speech, Rep. Rhee Q-taek, floor leader of the Grand National Party (GNP) denounced the President's view of the media.

"I personally get the impression he is trying to intimidate the press," Rhee said. "That's why the president's remarks triggered boos from the lawmakers with the GNP."

The GNP earlier criticized Roh's administration for putting a gag on the press by curbing reporters' meetings with government officials and only releasing information with a pro-government bias.

After finishing his official speech, Roh revealed that he intends to withdraw his appointment of former aide Seo Dong-ku as the new president of the state-run Korea Broadcasting System (KBS).

Seo's appointment ignited anger from the opposition parties and labor unions. They said the president is attempting to undermine fair broadcasting and impose his views on the press. Seo is reported to have tendered his resignation yesterday.

Roh's partisans have had an acrimonious relationship with several newspapers, and, to Americans, some of the fallout would border on the ridiculous:
The main opposition Grand National Party said Monday that it would take active measures against a new civic group set up to campaign against the major newspapers. The Grand Nationals said the group, People's Power, which plans a movement to discourage people from marrying people who write for the Chosun Ilbo or their relatives, was engaging in action that endangers democracy.

So far, I've been profoundly unimpressed at Roh's presidency so far:
1. the campaign, in which he suggested that the South might remain neutral in any dispute between the US and the North,
2. the troop dispatch bill, which I've mentioned before, and
3. this.


Posted 3:41 PM by Tony


New Templates!

You may have noticed that there's a new template in place. Props to HTML Babes Robyn Pullman and Stacy Tabb over at Sekimori for such a great job!


Posted 1:17 PM by Tony


Mortgaging The Future

There's a scene from Blackhawk Down that really stuck in my memory. The trucks having left them behind, the Rangers are trying to get back to their base. They are engaged in a running firefight with Somalis all the way back. One soldier crouches, and aims his M-16 at a mob of Somalis, who are mostly running away. One woman speculatively eyes an AK-47, lying on the ground nearby. The soldier has her in his sights, and keeps whispering, "Don't do it! Don't do it!" His whispered plea? prayer? comes to naught, as the Somali woman picks up the rifle, and starts to aim it at the Americans. The Ranger fires, and the woman falls to the street.

That soldier made the right call. Once a person picks up a weapon and points it at American troops, the natural disinclination to fire on civilians is subsumed by the necessity of personal survival.

Presumably, the Iraqis also know this, as I've pointed out before.

Which is why I find this so horrifying:


An Iraqi Baath militia officer giving guns to his children.
(from NY Times/Agence France-Presse, Patrick Baz)


To be honest, I don't know if the officer was letting his kids temporarily play with his own equipment or permanently giving it to them. Either way, the sight of children holding real guns is appalling.

The protection of children is one of the stronger biological imperatives. Parents, I figure, are supposed to defend their children from threats - that's part of the job. My blog pal Dawn is a pretty good example. What kind of government, then, would fly in the face of this imperative and make use of child soldiers a public policy?

Is it one whose overthrow is worth protesting?

During the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s, Iran made use of child soldiers:

No estimates are available on the number of children who participated in the Iran-Iraq war, but Hojjatoleslam Hashemi Rafsanjani, later president, stated in 1982 that Iran's armed forces had been supplemented by 400,000 volunteers. An exiled source claims that since military service was compulsory from the age of 18, most of these "volunteers" were likely to be younger. Gulf war statistics about prisoners, casualties and their ages are unreliable, but according to the International Committee of the Red Cross at least 10 per cent of Iranian prisoners were under 18. Iranian officers captured by the Iraqis claimed that nine out of ten Iranian child soldiers were killed. According to one journalist, most recruits had between one and three months of military training before being sent to the front, but some had no training at all. Boys as young as nine were reportedly used in human wave attacks and to serve as mine sweepers in the war with Iraq. Many child soldiers were captured by the Iraqis and transferred to a special Prisoner of War camp for children. Some 300, most believed to be 15 or younger were held by Iraq in a special, separated compound at Al-Ramadi, about 60 miles west of Baghdad, where they were exploited by the Iraqi authorities for propaganda purposes.
[footnotes deleted, emphasis added - Tony]


It's often said that the children are the future. In this war, I fear that Hussein may be mortgaging Iraq's future.


Posted 12:45 PM by Tony


Computer Games and War, Again

I'm a big fan of computer gaming. I've previously pointed out a news story in which this war and computer gaming have been discussed together.

James Lileks raises the computer gaming reference in his most recent piece:

During Gulf War One people called the conflict a “video game war,” and this always made me grind my teeth, because the sort of person most likely to use the term was least likely to have played a video game. When you saw that nosecone footage of a cruise missile dropping down, homing in and entering a dryer vent - someone said “it’s just like a video game!” you recalled the herkyjerky pixel-jumble on your PC and thought, I wish.

Fast forward ten years. I’ve played three games in the last ten months, each a first person shooter with all the usual flaws and uncomfortable moral dilemmas. I had no moral qualms with Return to Castle Wolfenstein - frankly, Nazis who are attempting to build an army of cyberzombies are just asking for some of that sweet, sweet lovin’ you only get from a Tesla-coil powered energy weapon. With Wolfenstein, Dark Forces 3 and Soldier of Fortune, there’s the same curious insta-decomp feature: clear out a room, leave your foes heaped in a pile, leave the room, return -

. . . and the bodies are gone.

Every day I watch the news, hours and hours of news, and I’ve yet to see one dead Iraqi soldier.

Now it’s a video game war.

Last night I saw some footage from a bunker some Marines had discovered - ammo, rockets, mines, all sorts of goodies. A secret area!

Now it’s a video game war.


3rd Infantry Division captain holding an AK-47 retrieved from a bunker in Baghdad
(from CNN/AP)


Dang, I wish I could write like this.


Posted 10:01 AM by Tony


Inside Sources

Looks like we've taken one of Saddam's presidential palaces. (How many does he have anyway? Sure seems like a lot.)

If you want to see what the inside of these places looks like, check out Moxie's page. Darn her for having such great journalism connections!


3rd Infantry Division soldiers at one of Saddam's palaces, Baghdad
(from CNN/AP)



Posted 9:10 AM by Tony


Demographic Changes

Think back to college for a minute. I graduated from college in 1992. One of the big protests back then involved American involvement in El Salvador and Nicaragua. One incident remains vivid in my memory. A group of students had built a ramschackle shantytown across from Smiley Hall as a gesture of solidarity with, I think it was the FMLN. Or perhaps it was some other alphabet soup guerilla organization. Regardless, the array of shacks was occupied with students allocating equal time to chants in support of the guerillas and against U.S. policy.

Another big protest was during the First Gulf War. Needless to say, I didn't really sympathize with the protestors in either case. Instead, I reserved my teen angst for more important causes, such as the adminstration's crackdown on student beer-drinking.

Today's New York Times indicates that the times may be a' changin', at least on campus:

Here at Amherst College, many students were vocally annoyed this semester when 40 professors paraded into the dining hall with antiwar signs. One student confronted a protesting professor and shoved him.

Some students here accuse professors of behaving inappropriately, of not knowing their place.

"It seems the professors are more vehement than the students," Jack Morgan, a sophomore, said. "There comes a point when you wonder are you fostering a discussion or are you promoting an opinion you want students to embrace or even parrot?"

Across the country, the war is disclosing role reversals, between professors shaped by Vietnam protests and a more conservative student body traumatized by the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Prowar groups have sprung up at Brandeis and Yale and on other campuses. One group at Columbia, where last week an antiwar professor rhetorically called for "a million Mogadishus," is campaigning for the return of R.O.T.C. to Morningside Heights.

Even in antiwar bastions like Cambridge, Berkeley and Madison, the protests have been more town than gown. At Berkeley, where Vietnam protesters shouted, "Shut it down!" under clouds of tear gas, Sproul Plaza these days features mostly solo operators who hand out black armbands. The shutdown was in San Francisco, and the crowd was grayer.

Interesting stuff.


Posted 9:02 AM by Tony

Friday, April 04, 2003
Evolving Relationships

As allied forces clean up in Basra and approach Baghdad's city limits, it's time to consider what happens afterwards. One of those things, I think, is a re-assessment of our relations with other countries and international institutions.

Since this crisis began, I think we've all been surprised at the actions of our putative allies. It's really hard for me to not be bitter about all this:

France, Belgium, and Germany formed a nay-saying bloc, insisting on more ineffective UN resolutions, and inspectors who seemed to be willfully blind. Moreover, they attempted to block American attempts to allow for NATO deployment of Patriot missiles to protect Turkey from missile and air attack. And to what point? The inspectors were played for suckers by Saddam, and coalition forces now face the prospect of fighting battles in chemical gear in 90 degree weather.

Canada chose, at the last minute, to deny military or moral support to this undertaking. In addition, Prime Minister Chretien's government has brought Canadian-American relations to a new low as a result of its actions over the past year. (For another post)

Turkey denied passage to US troops, preventing Central Command from opening up a second, northern avenue of attack. Ships holding the 4th Infantry Division's equipment waited offshore for two weeks for Turkey's parliament to vote no, then had to be rerouted to Kuwait. As a result, the 4th Infantry, the most advanced and deadly formation the US Army fields, has yet to be deployed, and will likely arrive too late to be of much use. Granted, Rumsfeld perhaps should have sent more troops earlier. However, the result remains that, no advance from the north, or credible threat thereof, occurred, giving Saddam's forces the chance to concentrate against our forces coming from the south. Then, citing the need for its own security, it went ahead and moved troops into northern Iraq. Then on April 2, it finally allowed a supply convoy to reach 1200 paratroopers who had dropped into northern Iraq, but whether further shipments will be allowed is unclear. In all likelihood, the delay, and the effects associated with it, caused otherwise avoidable coalition casualties.

Same thing with Saudi Arabia, except there was never any doubt that it would deny entry to allied ground forces. The effect was to keep everybody in Kuwait, limiting our options and making our plans discernible to everyone.

And now the European Triple Alliance has indicated, that, now, they want the coalition to succeed:

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder for the first time called for the removal of Saddam Hussein in a speech to parliament on Thursday, dropping his objection to regime change as a goal of war.
[...]
Schroeder has condemned regime change as a war aim -- but Germany avoided the French predicament of having to declare that it hoped the U.S.-led coalition would win the war after remarks interpreted as rallying for an American loss.

Only as long as the United Nations is in charge and French companies get a shot at reconstructing Iraq, of course.

Excuse me? Things are not going to return to the status quo ante, despite what some countries may wish. The coalition has paid the cost incurred due to those countries' actions, in both political goodwill and casualties. Now they seek to reap the benefit from the costs they have imposed on us, and turn Iraq over to an impotent international body? Now, that's chutzpah, and such antics should hardly be rewarded.

I confess, writing these words comes as a surprise. I used to consider myself a very Eisenhower type of Republican. You know, free markets, commerce solves everything type. A person who had great faith in multilateral institutions, particularly security arrangements such as NATO. A Hamiltonian, to use Walter Russell Mead's terminology. Even after seeing the ineffective posturing of the UN in Bosnia, I still felt that it, NATO, and other multinational institutions had value. Not any more. The events of the last 19 months have changed my perspective a great deal and wrecked my faith in multinational polities and organizations, I fear.

These governments are all democracies (Saudi Arabia excepted), and have the right to make their own decisions. Fine. Vox populi. I would just point out that the United States also has the right to make its own decisions in response.

I'll grant that a large percentage of Americans share the view of these nations concerning the war, or for that matter, decisive action against Saddam. But I suspect that many Americans, like me, have been angered by the actions of those we saw as friends.

Victor Davis Hanson may be on to something. I don't agree with everything he advocates, but he does raise some very interesting points, and with respect to Saudi Arabia and Europe, I think he's spot on. (Incidentally, I have now become a huge fan of alternative fuel research.)

Do these governments really know what they have wrought in many Americans' attitudes?
I suspect not:


(from StrategyPage)



Posted 6:32 PM by Tony


Civilian Casualties

After the war started, I watched coverage of the major anti-war demonstrations happening in San Francisco. One major complaint apparently was that the American military did not care about civilian casualties.

Let's compare:

Fox News has an article over an incident that occurred today:

A car exploded at a special operations checkpoint in western Iraq, killing three coalition soldiers, a pregnant woman and the car's driver, the U.S. Central Command said Friday.
[...]
"A pregnant female stepped out of the vehicle and began screaming in fear," a Central Command statement said. "At this point the civilian vehicle exploded, killing three coalition force members who were approaching the vehicle and wounding two others." The statement said the woman and the driver also were killed.
[...]
The Iraqi government has said suicide bombings will be a "routine military policy" and has promised more attacks.

And contrast:

A March 31 article in the New York Times, on the fighting in Hindiyah:

On the contested bridge in Hindiya, the captured town south of Baghdad, an American company commander, Capt. Chris Carter of Watkinsville, Ga., dashed to a wounded Iraqi woman in a black chador lying exposed to fire in the center of the span. Captain Carter crouched with his M-16 rifle to cover her position until medics could evacuate her by stretcher, according to journalists traveling with the unit.


Third Infantry Division, near Hindiyah, Iraq, March 31, 2003
(photo NY Times/AP)



I suspect that protestors who are simply waiting for another My Lai are bound to be sorely disappointed.


Posted 8:38 AM by Tony


Shouldn't I Get Workers' Comp For This?

The Department of Labor classifies my occupation as "sedentary."

However, my work is not without its risks. I've just fallen victim to an occupational hazard.

Paper cuts.

Ouch.


Posted 7:52 AM by Tony

Thursday, April 03, 2003
Getting Off Light

Yesterday, I wrote about a Marine reservist who suddenly decided he was a conscientious objector on what I thought was the verge of his unit's deployment.

Then I found this, which changes my opinion of this guy quite a bit:

Funk turned himself in to the Marines on Tuesday after being absent without leave since mid-February, when his support battalion was sent to Camp Pendleton near San Diego. He has been assigned desk duty in San Jose while his case proceeds.

Note the chain of events: Funk's unit deploys. Funk does not report until six weeks after the unit left for San Diego.

He's getting off pretty darned lightly, and should be grateful he isn't facing the prospect of a general court-martial.

I did a quick search on the relevant offenses, and found several offenses Funk could get charged with under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Article 85 - Desertion
Defined
(a) Any member of the armed forces who--
(1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently;
(2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or
(3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another on of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States;
is guilty of desertion.
[...]
(c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.

Maximum punishment
Completed or attempted desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty (emphasis added) or to shirk important service: dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 5 years.
Other cases of completed or attempted desertion: only difference is length of confinement
In time of war: death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.

Article 86 - Absence without leave
Defined
Any member of the armed forces who, without authority--
(1) fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed;
(2) goes from that place; or
(3) absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Maximum punishment
Note: unauthorized absence for more than 30 days duration is an aggravated unauthorized absence
Absence from unit, organization, or other place of duty; for more than 30 days: dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

Article 87 - Missing Movement
Defined
Any person subject to this chapter who through neglect or design misses the movement of a ship, aircraft, or unit with which he is required in the course of duty to move shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

Maximum punishment
By design: dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 2 years.
By neglect: bad-conduct dischrage, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for 1 year.

(taken from Manual for Courts-Martial, 2000, available as PDF here)

It's not about whether Funk is a conscientious objector or gay, as he now claims. It's all about timing.

Like I said, so far, he's getting off pretty lightly.


Posted 6:49 PM by Tony

Wednesday, April 02, 2003
Asymmetric Warfare

I was having a conversation about the war with someone. The topic of Iraq's wartime conduct came up. Ralph Peters provides a few examples:

* Used their own people as human shields in countless instances.
* Engaged in acts of genocide against Shi'a Muslims in the south of Iraq.
* Forced Iraqi civilians to take up arms at gunpoint.
* Executed Iraqi civilians on the spot for any suspicion of disloyalty or even indifference.
* Cut off food and water to Shi'a Muslim urban populations.
* Used the most sacred shrines of Iraq's Shi'as as military strongpoints and arms caches. [on the news this morning, there was a report of snipers firing at US forces from a mosque in Najaf. - Tony]
* Used hospitals as military staging areas, fighting positions and arms storage depots.
* Took Iraqi family members, including children, hostage.
* Executed allied POWs in cold blood, while abusing others.
* Prevented the International Red Cross or Red Crescent from visiting allied soldiers taken as POWs.
* Fought in civilian clothes, in violation of the Geneva Convention and the Laws of War.
* Employed false surrenders to lure allied troops into ambushes, in violation of the same.
* Committed multiple acts of terrorism against Iraqi civilians and coalition forces.
* Forced unwilling soldiers to attack allied forces by executing some and driving the others forward at machine-gun point - far from patriotic resistance, this is the mass murder of Iraqis by Iraqis.
* Attempted to create an ecological and economic catastrophe in Iraq's Shi'a and Kurdish regions by rigging oil fields for demolition.
* Attempted to prevent relief supplies from reaching Iraqi civilians.
* Welcomed and harbored terrorists from abroad.
* Took practical steps to prepare Iraqi troops for the use of chemical weapons against allied forces.

The person I was talking to said, "if you were fighting for the survival of your nation, you'd use every mean at your disposal, too."

It's called asymmetric warfare - take advantage of your enemy's weaknesses, and play to your own strengths. But there are some areas where doing so is simply unjustified.

The Geneva Convention and other rules of warfare establish floors of conduct to ensure that an intrinsically brutal business doesn't exceed certain moral and ethical boundaries. This may be difficult at times, as I've discussed before the war started. Without them, nothing would prevent the US Army, hypothetically, from doing to Baghdad what the Romans did to Carthage. But it doesn't, and in return, America expects others to follow the same rules.

An inability to match American strength-to-strength does not justify acting beyond those floors of conduct. Some means are simply unjustifiable to civilized peoples; I'd put the execution of POWs right up there.


Posted 7:07 PM by Tony


Excess Enthusiasm

I mentioned yesterday that PFC Lynch had been rescued by special operations forces. Unfortunately, a Central Command spokesman seems to have gotten a tad carried away:

Jim Wilkinson, a spokesman for U.S. commander General Tommy Franks in Qatar, said: "America doesn't leave its heroes behind. It never has, it never will."

That's clearly false. If such was really the case, no Americans would have ever been Missing in Action.

Here's a list of MIA figures for America's conflicts (via POW/MIA "All Wars")

Revolutionary War: 1,426
War of 1812: 695
Mexican War: 238
Civil War: >400,000 total POW/MIA
Spanish-American War: 72
WWI: 7470 total POW/MIA
WWII: 30,314
misc. Cold War: 343
Grenada: 4
USS Stark: 1
Gulf War: 52 total POW/MIA
Somalia: 2

In almost every case, the government chose to close the files and walk away. It may have done so because of pragmatic considerations.

But to say America never leaves its soldiers behind is to utter something provably false.


Posted 6:38 PM by Tony


Poles In Iraq, Part II

I blogged earlier about GROM, the Polish commando unit, operating in Iraq. I was trying to find the picture mentioned in the story with the commandos posing with Navy SEALs, and thanks to Google, finally found it.


Polish GROM commandos pictured together with U.S. Navy SEALs, Iraq
(photo Desmond Boylan/Reuters, via Poprostu)



Meanwhile, the Korean National Assembly has finally approved the deployment of a detachment of engineers and medical personnel to Iraq. I found this bit enlightening:

"As you have seen in the case of Iraq, the United States will not make its decision on the North's nuclear issue on a moral basis," [President Roh] said. "Accordingly, for a peaceful solution to the nuclear issue, the strong alliance between South Korea and the United States is very crucial."

Of course, I don't really find this surprising, as his presidential campaign reflected a certain antipathy (for lack of a better word) to the United States and its relation with the South.


Posted 4:38 PM by Tony


Someone Unclear On The Concept

There's a story in today's Chronicle that a Marine reservist is applying for conscientious objector status just as his unit readies for deployment to Iraq.

Funk is one of several service members in today's volunteer military who are seeking conscientious objector status.

The recruits say their idealistic expectations of military service -- travel, tuition and adventure -- jarred against the harsh realities of killing another human and ran afoul of deeply held religious, ethical or moral views.

"They don't really advertise that they kill people," Funk said. "I didn't really realize the full implications of what I was doing and what it really meant to be in the service as a reservist."


Lance Corporal Stephen Funk, USMC Reserve
(photo from SF Chronicle)


Run that by me again? I hate to point out the obvious, but he did enlist voluntarily in the United States Marine Corps, not the Peace Corps.

If you want to be against this war, or war in general, fine. I wouldn't agree, but I think we could all get along with our differences. This is different. For Funk to realize that being a Marine actually involves shooting, just as his unit ships out to a combat zone, makes him,... well, words fail me.

A friend of mine, who used to be in the 101st Airborne, used to jokingly claim that Marines were stupid (not quite the word, but close). This little story doesn't really help counter that.


Posted 8:38 AM by Tony

Tuesday, April 01, 2003
Sometimes One Problem Solves Another

When I lived in Seoul, I used to read the Korea Herald all the time. As one of two English language newspapers in Korea (not counting the ones serving the US military), it was an essential slice of home for many expatriates. The Herald would have news stories from around the world in a language I could understand, and, most importantly, kept me up to date with all the sports back home. Strange as it is to say in an age of broadband, the Herald was a slim, tenuous link to home, that just happened to smell of newsprint. One of my best friends worked there after I left, so I felt sort of connected to the paper.

Which makes this a shock. The shock isn't that the editor is against the war. A lot of people are. I don't agree with it, but I understand the sentiment.

What shocked (but not awed) me, was this:

Under these circumstances, it is not difficult to imagine that, as an innate liberal, Roh now finds it even more difficult to explain why the nation must join forces for this war while most other nations - including other stalwart allies of the United States - try to stay away.

Is he going to say he is afraid that Bush may want to "liberate" the North Korean population after the Iraqis? Is he going to rhapsodize that the beauty of an alliance is in helping a friend in need?

Note her use of "liberate," expressing skepticism that North Korea doesn't need to be freed from its present dictatorship. I say "need" - whether such would be practical is another matter.

Apparently, Ms. Lee hasn't been keeping up with the news. I'd like to ask, if North Korea doesn't need liberation, then what's up with the gulags? See here. And here. And here.

Oh, yeah, and here:

At one camp, Camp 22 in Haengyong, some 50,000 prisoners toil each day in conditions that U.S. officials and former inmates say results in the death of 20 percent to 25 percent of the prison population every year.

Products made by prison laborers may wind up on U.S. store shelves, having been “washed” first through Chinese companies that serve as intermediaries.

Entire families, including grandchildren, are incarcerated for even the most bland political statements.

Forced abortions are carried out on pregnant women so that another generation of political dissidents will be “eradicated.”

Inmates are used as human guinea pigs for testing biological and chemical agents, according to both former inmates and U.S. officials.

I think Ms. Lee is right - no problems in North Korea, nope.

They say two problems solve each other. We need troops in Iraq. Opposition to stationing American troops is high in South Korea, and given the attitudes of the younger generation, will probably increase. The 2nd Infantry Division currently has two battalions each of armor, mechanized infantry, and air cavalry, as well as artillery and supporting units, all within 30 miles of the border. There also several squadrons of F-16s and A-10s stationed at Osan and Kunsan. So let's pull them out. Let South Korea regain control of its military and let it deal with the tunnels, the incidental cross-border commando incursions, naval confrontations, nuclear weapons problem and North Korea's charming vacation villages by itself. Everybody wins.

Of course, I'm being a bit sarcastic, but this sort of stuff is starting to trigger the "If you don't like it, up yours" side of me, which is most definitely American in nature.


Posted 7:51 PM by Tony


I Feel That Old Age Coming On

I started getting white hair in 3rd grade. I never really thought much about it, since it was evenly distributed and came in gradually. This morning, I noticed that I was getting a higher concentration of white hair in the area just in front of my ears and under my glasses. At 30. Damn.

Old age is going to have to drag me, kicking and screaming. Mostly screaming, I figure.


Posted 7:14 PM by Tony


Retrieval

Looks the Iraqis aren't always going to have the chance to show POWs on TV. I have a sneaking suspician al-Jazeera won't be playing any footage about this on their channel:

American special operations forces have rescued an Army enlisted woman from a building in Nasiriya, in southern Iraq, where she was being held captive, the American military said.

The soldier, Pfc. Jessica Lynch, 19, of Palestine, W.Va., was part of the 507th Ordnance Maintenance Company ambushed in Nasiriya on March 23 after the military convoy she was in took a wrong turn in the dark off a highway en route to an antiaircraft battery in southern Iraq.

All told, officials later said, 15 soldiers were missing, captured or killed in the encounter, with Private Lynch's fate and that of seven comrades listed as unknown. She was not among five soldiers whom the Arab satellite news network Al Jazeera showed being interviewed in captivity.


PFC Jessica Lynch - chalk one up for the good guys
(photo Washington Post/AP)


Poor Professor De Genova must be crushed. I suppose he'll just have to settle for a million-minus-one Mogadishus, then. Yeah, I know I'm dwelling over that statement too much, but it still bugs the hell out of me. How in the world does such a person become a professor at freaking Columbia?! Geez.

Here's hoping that we get the other POWs back soon, and that we finally find out what happened to Lt. Commander Speicher.


Posted 7:04 PM by Tony


British Humor

A buddy of mine, who previously refused to take some helpful advice on symposium naming, is a big fan of British humor. I don't mean Monty Python or Benny Hill, but more obscure fare. He urged me to try watching it. I did, and I just didn't get it. To me, it seemed that you had to be born in some town ending in "-shire" to get all the jokes. Those kinds of shows were just beyond me, though I'm sure Homer Simpson would have enjoyed them quite a bit.

[Aside - for those of you who know me, aren't you surprised I've been blogging so far without making a single Simpsons reference?]

Then I read this Mark Steyn column, describing the British Army in Iraq:

The British colonel explaining how they were trying to secure Basra without blowing up buildings and causing a lot of civilian deaths, and remarking: "We don't want to go in and rattle all their teacups."

The two squaddies scoffing at Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon's explanation in Parliament that "Umm Qasr is a town similar to Southampton." "He's either never been to Southampton, or he's never been to Umm Qasr," said one soldier, informed of this while on patrol in Umm Qasr. The second added: "There's no beer, no prostitutes, and people are shooting at us. It's more like Portsmouth."

I'm starting to come around to my friend's point of view.


Posted 6:29 PM by Tony

Monday, March 31, 2003
The Ice (Cream) Man Cometh

Remember those Heinz ketchup commercials? You know, the ones in which people have to wait and wait and wait for the ketchup to come out? Some things are apparently worth waiting for.

I was reminded of that yesterday when I went to see the Giants lose to the Mariners yesterday. Of course, it's always a pleasure to see the Giants get smacked down, but that's another story. My friend and I were watching the game when we heard a vendor from the lower level shout, "Nestle Tollhouse Ice Cream Sandwiches!"

My friend got pretty psyched up about it, enough so that I wanted one of the darned things as well. We waited. And waited. And waited. Alas, the vendor never walked by our section. Finally, my friend settled for a different ice cream product. Unfortunately, the ice cream had partially melted, and was oozing out of its chocolate shell. He could only eat half of it, before setting it aside, disgusted.

I kept waiting. And waiting. And waiting.

After 2 more innings, we heard the shout, louder this time: "Nestle Tollhouse Ice Cream Sandwiches!" The vendor had at last made it to our level. I turned me head, and gave the vendor a knowing nod, which he returned, walking over to where we were. I bought the ice cream sandwich, and opened up the wrapper. Perfection.

Some things really are worth waiting for.


Posted 9:43 AM by Tony


Special Operations

Looks like our special operations people have been pretty busy:

The U.S. Special Forces and CIA operatives are now spread throughout Iraq, from Baghdad to the borders. This morning, for instance, working off information from Special Forces, F-15 pilots attacked a two-story building near Basra where hundreds of ruling Baath party leaders were believed to be gathered.

"We can find that these terror leaders are in fact having a meeting, and then call in very precise strikes to destroy that. And I'm pleased to say the result of that, we believe about 200 leaders of these irregular squads and key leaders [were] destroyed last night," said Maj. Gen. Victor Renuart of U.S. Central Command in Qatar.

Since Friday evening, coalition air strikes have targeted nine different Baath party headquarters, and a leadership compound in Baghdad.

Also this weekend, Army Rangers operating in total darkness engaged in a ferocious firefight to take what they said was an Iraqi commando headquarters in the western desert.

"The raid was successful and resulted in the capture of over 50 enemy personnel, weapons, a large cache of ammunition, gas masks, and radios," said Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks.

For at least a week, CIA paramilitary teams have been trying to kill members of Saddam Hussein's inner circle and Iraqi miltiary commanders, using snipers and demolition experts, The Washington Post reported today.

"Any military commander, whether they be in the Republican Guard or the regular army, would be a valid target," said retired U.S. Army Gen. Bill Nash, an ABCNEWS consultant.

Only a few of these have reportedly been killed, but the military and CIA are continuing to hunt them down.

Ralph Peters has some commentary on their performance. Looks like they're getting the job done.

I suspect that Professor De Genova will be disappointed. By the way, if you want a good laugh, check out the examples of his published work at the Columbia web site.

Note to my friend - I'm not being bitter here, just sarcastically amused. I do think some anger is justifiable when a person advocates the death and defeat of U.S. servicemen in "a million Mogadishus." Looks like Hussein is taking that to heart.


Posted 9:19 AM by Tony


Vietnam 2002 Travelogue, Part II (Dalat - like SF, but with fewer white people!)

[sent August 24, 2002, comments in brackets - Tony]

Hey guys,

BTW, if you ever hit Saigon, check out Sheridan's bar. It's authentic Irish, right down to the crap on the walls. K. had Corona - the irony of ordering a Mexican beer in an Irish pub in Vietnam was not lost on either of us.

7 hour bus trip to Dalat. Apparently, the concept of not smoking in a gas station has yet to catch on... [Somewhat to my surprise, tragedy did not befall us, and we avoided becoming Tourist Flambe.]

[Througout the entire trip, we'd still see hordes of people riding on mopeds on the highway. The bus driver, as a result would drive in the exact center of the road, moving aside only to avoid imminent impact with opposing traffic. It was terrifying at first, but after a while, you kind of develop a certain fatalistic sang froid about the whole thing.]

Dalat is at an elevation of 1475 m above sea level (4500 feet and some change), which makes it pleasantly cool. Unfortunately, it was raining. They call Dalat "The City of Flowers," and the amount I've seen in greenhouses and at the market certainly justifies the claim. This place is also known for the quality of its fruits and vegetables. [Paranoid that I am, I avoided eating the fresh fruits and vegetables, with a couple exceptions. All the vegetables I tried were part of cooked dishes, which were pretty darned good.]

We went to Stop N Go cafe, which is in the home of a local painter/sculptor/calligrapher/amateur horticulturist by the name of Duy Viet. It's really nice - you walk past a greenhouse full of flowers, and past a lot of plants until you reach his house. He was very gracious, and served us coffee and pastries while showing us his art. I was very impressed, but until I can spend 800 dollars and up for art, all I can do is look. :) His guests all write in 2 inch books he keeps for the purpose, and many draw or send pictures. Among the latter was John F. Kennedy, Jr.,
which was pretty cool.

Also visited a place locally known as "Crazy House." It's still under construction, but what's been built so far defies description. One part looks like a giant artificial mountain, and there's a couple of large giraffes, all of which have rooms in them. The owner rents them out, and apparently is immune from local zoning laws (she's the daughter of the guy that succeeded Ho Chi Minh). There's also a gallery in there (bought a painting myself). These two places are about as counter-culture as it gets, I think. [A friend of mine complained that she should have been the one on the exciting counterculture trip, not me. At the time, she was moving, travelling across the country by car. Far as I'm concerned, travelling through the heartland is pretty darned exotic. But, then again, I've never lived in Middle America, and I'm a sucker for cheesy roadside attractions. Yes, I'm a dork - people have already pointed that out to me, thank you. :)]

Another spot was a Bhuddist pagoda with only one monk. He's supposed to have painted or calligraphied over 10,000 pieces, and from the looks of it, I'd certainly believe it! [Canvases were stacked everywhere, filling every inch of storage space in the back. Interestingly, I met a group of middle aged Koreans there. They all had T-shirts in support of the Korean national soccer team (this was a big deal since the World Cup was in Korea in 2002 and the Korean team did surprisingly well). The slogan of the Korean team was "Be the Reds!," was emblazoned on their T-shirts, which I thought was amusing to see in a nominally Communist country.]

The last emperor of Viet Nam, Bao Dai, had his summer palace up here. It was raining hard when I went, and it was crowded with Vietnamese tourists. Despite the chains and the assorted signs in Vietnamese and English saying "Don't touch" (or sit or enter), everyone did touch, and sit, and enter. Sheesh. The palace was basically a large 2 story house, no big deal. Nice gardens, though. [I'm still surprised at the conduct of the tourists there, as it felt like I was at McDonald's rather than a cultural attraction. It rained hard that day, and walking back, I had to slog through water coming up to mid-calf. The red dirt of Vietnam still clings to those sneakers, despite my efforts at cleaning them. I suspect that some weird bonding process occurred between the dirt and my shoes]

[K. and I had actually split up that afternoon. I hit the pagoda and summer palace on my own, while K. went to check out the various waterfalls in the area. I think it was for the best, since I, for one, was feeling kind of tense. It's amazing how stressful travelling together can get. I think that having to coordinate schedules and dealing with a foreign place adds a certain element of friction. K. and I have known each other for over a decade, so it wasn't that bad, but I think we both felt the need for some independent sightseeing.]

We each paid 5 bucks for a train ride to a village 8 km away. We were the only paying customers, in only one car, and I felt a little ridiculous - but then the engineer stopped the train to let a couple of friends on.

And the ridiculously low prices continue - K. and I just had a dinner of stirfried veggies with tofu and fried noodles, crunchy deep-fried chicken, rice, and a 650 ml bottle of beer. Total cost - 56,000 dong (about $3.70)

Got sunburned. Figures that I'd get a red neck to go along with my love of country music. :) [This would later develop into a full, peeling, nerve-tingling char. Unfortunately, K. burned her leg on a moped exhaust, which, as we later discovered, every expat living in Vietnam develops.]

Anyways, that's it. Tomorrow, it's off to the beach town of Nha Trang. Hope to see everyone soon!


Posted 8:59 AM by Tony

Thursday, March 27, 2003
Vietnam 2002 Travelogue, Part I

[sent August 22, 2002, comments in brackets - Tony]

Hey all,

Last day in Saigon. Arrived Monday at Tan Son Nhut Airport. It used to be an American military base, and you can still see the weathered, half-cylindrical concrete shells of hangars and offices in between runways.

First thing you notice is the cost. For instance, I'm paying 100 dong/minute for Internet use, and the exchange rate is 15,000 dong/1 US dollar. Heck, I've had some pretty good breakfasts for 2 dollars! [And considering how little money I had when I got back, it was a darned good thing.]

Stayed with my friend J.'s aunt on the first night. She was very hospitable and showed me Saigon by night on moped. This is not for the faint of heart - there are hordes of mopeds on the streets, much as one might picture a swarm of locusts (for lack of a better metaphor). [The accumulated noise of countless mopeds combined to form a dull motorized roar. The noise was ubiquitous - no matter where you went, the sound of two-stroke engines followed. Fortunately, you could tune it out after a while. Also, for some odd reason, the trunks of the palm trees lining the streets are painted a reflective white.]

Have been travelling with an old college classmate for the last few days. Visited the War Remnants Museum, and the Reunification Palace, which used to be the old presidential palace when the tanks rolled in back in 1975. The propaganda aspect of these sites is not subtle, but are interesting nonetheless.

Today was rather fascinating. Went to the tunnels at Cu Chi, which the VC used as a base during the war. They widened a section of the tunnels for tourists to go through. However, it was still really tight. A group of us filed in single file, and you had to walk while squatting. There were electric lights set out every so often, but it was so narrow that the person in front of you would block it, casting you into absolute darkness. Definitely not for the claustrophobic. They also have a firing range where you can pay to fire an assortment of weapons, up to an M-60 machine gun. My friend and I tried the AK-47, which, incidentally, is very loud. [The gift shop sold snakes in bottles filled with alcohol. I was told that they were good for your health. Then again, that's what they told me about dog in Korea. Blame it on my upbringing - I couldn't find it within myself to try either. There were also exhibits demonstrating the booby traps the VC would use. The punji stake trap looked naaasty.]

Anyways, we're heading up to Dalat tomorrow, followed by Nha Trang, Hoi An, and Hue. Hope everyone is enjoying their summer!


Posted 6:57 PM by Tony


Reruns

I've been getting rather busy lately, so no time for original posting. In addition, it's been pointed out that I'm letting some of my anger with recent events flow over into my writing. So, I'm going to reprint some letters I wrote while I was traveling in Vietnam last year. My friends enjoyed them, so I thought I'd share.

Maybe I should have been a travel writer instead?


Posted 6:48 PM by Tony


Reefer Madness, 21st Century Style

Today's SF Chronicle has a story discussing whether kids are desensitized to violence as a result of computer games:

"In the research that we have seen," says Dr. Michael Bradley, a teen behavior psychologist in Philadelphia, "when kids watch real-life footage they are disappointed. There is no music, it is not in color and you don't have seven camera angles."

I imagine of especial concern would be the First Person Shooter games, in which the player views the game "through the eyes" of the character. I figure that the editors thought a story like this would be timely in light of the latest news. Unfortunately, the tone of the article manages to convey a certain anti-war sentiment combined with a sort of condescension to computer gamers.

I have my doubts about the harm this sort of stuff causes. Children have a very active fantasy life, it's true. But by the time they're become adults, people are generally able to distinguish fiction from fact. And as for those that don't, how much is attributable to computer gaming, as opposed to other potential factors?

We've seen this before. Remember when Mortal Kombat came out? Same concern, but I haven't seen any news articles discussing how people who grew up playing these games became violence-prone.

And before that, the media was in a lather about either Dungeons and Dragons or hard rock music, whenever some criminal had been found to have been into one or the other. Apparently, D&D and the music tempted the vulnerable person to Satan and led him to a life of sin. Or something like that. And before that, it was marijuana. Remember "Reefer Madness"?

Well, I grew up playing D&D, and still love listening to AC/DC. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to summon a single demon. I thought at this point, I'd at least be able to summon up a lesser denizen of the underworld, or something.

I'm so disappointed.


Posted 8:36 AM by Tony

Tuesday, March 25, 2003
Fisking, K-Town Style

I've made a habit of looking through English version of the Korea Herald and the Chosun Ilbo. For some reason, both newspapers featured editorials of such blinding stupidity that I felt compelled to fisk (description here) one or the other. The Korea Herald editorial was just pretty bad, but can be more or less summarized as, "Won't someone please think about the children?!"

I'm going with the Chosun Ilbo one, simply because it's shorter.

So without further ado, here's my take on "The U.S. and Its War Face," by Kim Dae-joong:

With the beginning of the attack on Iraq, the United States is abounding with emotions.
I was feeling hungry, tired, and irritated before the war. Now, I'm hungry, tired, and really effin' pissed off. Kind of funny how the execution and mistreatment of American prisoners will do that to you.
Although there were plenty of anti-war opinions voiced before the attack, now it looks as if Americans had long been wishing that this war would break out.
Because it's well known that Americans are a bloodthirsty and savage race. I've got calluses on my knuckles from dragging them on the floor. Our long-held desire for war caused us to keep going to the UN time and time again in our year-long "rush to war."
Maybe this can be explained by a need to achieve, through this attack, revenge for Sept. 11.
Maybe this can be explained by a need to actually disarm Iraq, as opposed to watching Hussein continually make fools of the UN?

But this is not a war.
It's not? Thanks for the clarification.
The classical definition of war involves two sides pointing guns at each other and fighting.
And before the invention of firearms, it was called "Groups Poking Each Other With Sharp Thingies And Other Stuff."
What we are seeing is a one-sided attack, a game in which the discrepancy in defense spending between the two sides is glaringly obvious.
Because where I'm from, we prefer two-sided stalemates that last for 50+ years. It's a lot more like a soccer match that way. To make it more even, every soldier in the 3rd Infantry will now be ordered to strip naked and sprint unarmed to Baghdad.
The war in Iraq seen from American television is a burst of pent-up military strength and clinical experiments of new weapons.
I don't know about the rest of my fellow Americans, but I'm just so ashamed we're expending weapons, not soldiers and Marines.
The coverage looks like a war movie.
But without the hotties.

Foreigners living in the United States feel somewhat bitter about the coverage, which glosses over the civilian casualties and focuses attention and sympathy on U.S. casualities.
All 14 of them? Of course we all know the military-industrial-talk radio complex is keeping the numbers much higher. And it's funny how American media are focusing on American casualties of a war in which American forces are involved.
Each of the big networks here has its own star commentator - something like a general - many of whom were in the same roles back in the 1991 Gulf War.
And all of us handsome hard-working foreign journalists are being wrongfully deprived of our name recognition! *whine*

With the public and the media falling in for the war effort, there is no place for anti-war or anti-Bush sentiments.
Looks like someone's been missing the protests in San Francisco, New York City, DC, and other U.S. cities. Odd failing for a newspaperman, that.
Here we see that even a developed country like the United States can be swept up in mass hysteria.
Unlike Korea, which treated the onset of WTO accession with calm and grace. And the currency collapse, aka the "IMF Crisis." And which boasts ultra-civilized legislators who haven't gotten into fistfights on the floor of the National Assembly for at least a couple years.

This excited atmosphere could be dangerous for Korea.
Uh, no. A nuclear-armed North Korea and South Koreans who think North Korea would never hurt the South because of "brotherhood" are dangerous to Korea.
If it persists until after the war in Iraq is over it could carry over into and affect decisions made to solve the nuclear crisis on the peninsula.
Thank God we have the benefit of thousands of years of constantly being invaded by the Chinese and the Japanese to guide our decisions! Punk-ass 200-year old democracy.
We could see confusion arising from U.S. actions in Korea resulting from irrational impulses.
Such as mobs attempting to storm the U.S. headquarterrs in South Korea after military disciplinary hearings don't go the way you wanted.
Naturally, Koreans observing recent developments cannot avoid being worried.
Americans may actually reconsider stationing troops in a country that appears to be ungrateful for its presence.
We could be facing a dilemma, in which neither a U.S. advancement nor a U.S. retreat is desirable.
We were really hoping for a U.S. defeat, but now we just can't decide.

The United States that we see now is different from the United States that we have known.
It's funny how assholes flying airplanes into office towers will do that.
Americans tolerate domestic anti-war sentiment in the name of diversity, but seethe at allies who voice anti-war and anti-American sentiments.
Taking offense because "allies" voice anti-American sentiments - those Yankees sure are craaazy!"
And it seems that the Americans will not budge an inch from their attitude of "American supremacy."
Actually it's called "Americans Giving Unhelpful Backstabbing "Allies" The Finger."

The writer is the Chosun Ilbo's Washington correspondent.
Who can kiss my American ass.

Just for the record, I'm in favor of American troops in South Korea, and I'm proud of my heritage. However, I can't help but read this sort of nonsense and not get really ticked off.


Posted 8:20 PM by Tony


Nobody's Buying

NEW! From the people that brought you Wahabiism, Osama, and the fraction 15/19, it's a Brand! New! Peace Proposal!

Count on this "peace" to cost just a little bit more than a set of ginsu knives.


Posted 11:27 AM by Tony


Better Blogs Than Mine

Dave Barry gives a suggestion on on fixing the U.S. - French divide, as well as some handy phrases.

He also has his own blog, so whatever you do, don't click this.


Posted 11:23 AM by Tony


It's All The Same, Right?

The philosophical concept that is absolutely guaranteed to enrage me is moral equivalency, i.e., that one side's actions stand on the same moral ground as the others. I've written about it before. With the capture and possible execution of American POWs by the Iraqis, the issue arises yet again.

Christie Blatchford, one of my favorite columnists, wrote about viewing the Iraqi video of the dead and captured Americans on CBC Newsworld:

One of these airings was followed by an interview with a man named François Boo, a security expert. Mr. Boo said straight away that such parading of captured soldiers was a clear violation of the Geneva Convention, to which Iraq, I note with amusement, is a signatory. He appeared to have his head screwed on nice and straight. Then the female host of the show guided him toward the point she wanted made. But the United States, she asked, has also surely engaged in the techniques of psychological warfare? Ah yes, said Mr. Boo, and one of them -- I was so furious I can't remember which -- referred to the millions of leaflets the American-led coalition has dropped over Iraq, urging soldiers to surrender rather than fight.

You see? The sides in this war are indistinguishable, if not equally culpable of equal sins, at least equally capable of them.

That is the pervasive sense of phony egalitarianism nourished by the era of instantaneous communication and the absolute democracy of the World Wide Web: All war violence is the same, equally inexcusable; all news sources are equally trustworthy or not; American and British soldiers are as every bit suspect as Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard; every opinion is equally valuable, and there must be no judgment. Every life is worth the same as every other. Every sperm is sacred.

[...]

But America does not parade its prisoners of war on television, being asked questions while in a state of abject fear and humiliation. American soldiers do not conduct "search and rescue" operations for defenceless Iraqi soldiers by shooting up rivers and setting bushes on fire, as the Iraqis did in Baghdad yesterday, when they believed, apparently erroneously, that coalition pilots had been shot down and landed in the water. That was quite a splendid scene. American soldiers may whoop with excitement at the sound of a missile being fired, but you do not find them dancing, in celebration, at the deaths of civilians; the same cannot be said of the Arab world.

So, detention at Guantanamo and dropping leaflets = possible execution of Americans and videotaping the interrogation of injured POWs.

Right.


Posted 11:15 AM by Tony


The Red Zone

Watching TV anchors working themselves into a collective lather, one gets the notion that coalition forces are going to be sucker punched hard as we approach “the red zone,” the area around Baghdad where Saddam has presumably concentrated his forces. It’s going to be Dunkirk, Mogadishu, and the Tet Offensive all rolled into one!

Not.

Ralph Peters points out:

I simply cannot understand why anyone outside of Ba'ath Party headquarters imagines we would feel compelled to fight house-to-house in Baghdad, destroying the city, putting civilian lives at risk and throwing away our soldiers.

Certainly, we'll need to engage in some limited urban combat, for specific objectives - as the Brits are doing on the outskirts of Basra and the Marines have done in Nasiriyah. But there is no iron rule of warfare that says we have to take Baghdad block by block.

[…]

When the right opportunities present themselves, our forces will swoop in on pinpoint raids. And no, we're not talking about "Black Hawk Down II." Anyway, people tend to forget that, in Mogadishu, we actually won the tactical battle overwhelmingly - 20 dead Americans, a thousand dead Somali militiamen.

At the end of that fight, we had thoroughly broken "General" Aideed's forces. Then President Bill Clinton, the most frightened man on earth, declared defeat. The U.S. Army's Rangers were ordered home in humiliation, after winning a tough but enormous victory. President Bush may have his faults, but he ain't going to cut and run on our men and women in uniform.

It’s not going to be easy. But it’ll happen.

Meanwhile, here’s hoping that the 4th Infantry Division gets in-theater soon. The 4th Infantry is a testbed unit of the Army’s new technologies, and will give the U.S. a second heavy division in the theater. They may be needed, if certain military commentators are correct.


Posted 11:02 AM by Tony


Waiting For Seoul

I wrote yesterday that Poland’s special operations forces had participated in the seizure of Umm Qasr. Meanwhile, South Korea’s National Assembly is delaying a vote on whether to dispatch a detachment of engineers and medical personnel to the Gulf. Interesting how the ally which doesn’t have American troops safeguarding its liberty is the one providing combatants.

Thanks for nothing, cousins.


Posted 11:01 AM by Tony

Monday, March 24, 2003
Uni-what-sis?

This is interesting - according to Reuters, Poland has admitted that its commandos had participated in the capture of the port city of Umm Qasr:

The Defense Ministry had denied that GROM (Thunder) special forces were involved in combat, but on Monday it confirmed their participation after dailies splashed photographs of the soldiers in the Iraqi port of Umm Qasr, where U.S.-led troops are battling pockets of Iraqi resistance.

[...]

GROM is an SAS-style commando unit which has seen recent action in Afghanistan. It is one of the few highly trained units in Poland's armed forces, which are mostly underfunded and still rely on outdated Soviet-era equipment.

[...]

The Reuters photographs showed masked GROM soldiers taking prisoners, scrawling graffiti on a portrait of Saddam and posing with U.S. Navy Seals holding up a U.S. flag.

"These photos shouldn't have happened," said [Defense Minister Jerzy] Szmajdzinski. "The next time it will definitely be with the Polish flag."


Polish GROM commandos, Umm Qasr, Iraq
(via Reuters)



I suspect that we'll soon see non-governmental organizations complaining about US forces shooting at Iraqi forces disguised as civilians:

"We saw some black berets hanging up in a tree, and we went to investigate and we saw all these uniforms hanging there. I figure half these guys you see walking around are soldiers. They've discarded their uniforms," the Marine [at An Nasiriyah] said. "They're out there, they're watching us and they're planning small counterattacks."

Which explains scenes like this, I figure:


Marines escorting Iraqi prisoners
(via Washington Post/Reuters)



Posted 3:05 PM by Tony


A Note From The Management

I'm going to be cutting down some on the warblogging. More specifically, I'll point out stuff and put in quotes, but will avoid original commentary.

I've been getting worked up watching the news, and it's starting to affect the coherency of my posts. While there's nothing wrong with honest emotion, it's a waste of time to write while overcome by it.

In the meantime, here's a nice bit by Lileks, summing up what I feel, but with a lot more wit:

I’m not disheartened by the sight of what those motherless sons of bitches did to the captured troops - not in the sense of wishing we would curl up and whimper Mommy and scamper back home. My first reaction was to wish that we’d identify the location of a Special Republican Guard unit, replace the B in MOAB with P, and drop the Mother Of All Payback on them. This intemperate emotion conflicts with the advice of lumbering pseudoprole Michael Moore, seen earlier this week wearing a button that said “Shoot Movies, Not Iraqis.” Well, Mike, the Iraqis shot a movie about the shooting of Americans; what now?

Update: To see what Lileks is talking about, see here. Warning: discretion advised.


Posted 9:51 AM by Tony


Fictional Documentaries

Michael Moore won an Oscar last night for “Bowling For Columbine.” In my opinion, the piece is so rife with distortions that it does not qualify as a documentary.

For example, there’s this:

BANK: Moore says North Country Bank & Trust in Traverse City, Mich., offered a deal where, "if you opened an account, the bank would give you a gun." He walks into a branch and walks out with a gun.

ACTUALLY: Moore didn't just walk in off the street and get a gun. The transaction was staged for cameras. You have to buy a long-term CD, then go to a gun shop to pick up the weapon after a background check.

If Michael Moore deserves to win an Oscar for Best Documentary, then so does Leni Riefenstahl, as far as I’m concerned.

Update: The problem in blogging is that it's sometimes hard to find the right links afterwards. I had been looking for this earlier, and only now just found it. More on the bank:

But Jan Jacobson, the bank employee who worked with Mr. Moore on his account, says that only happened because Mr. Moore's film company had worked for a month to stage the scene. "What happened at the bank was a prearranged thing," she says. The gun was brought from a gun dealer in another city, where it would normally have to be picked up. "Typically, you're looking at a week to 10 days waiting period," she says. Ms. Jacobson feels used: "He just portrayed us as backward hicks."


Posted 8:16 AM by Tony

Sunday, March 23, 2003
Outrage

Looks like Blix’s Blind Mice missed a spot:

A senior pentagon official has confirmed to Fox News on Sunday that coalition forces have discovered a "huge" suspected chemical weapons factory near the Iraqi city of An Najaf, which is situated some 90 miles south of Baghdad.

Watching the Fox News Channel, the site is apparently 100 acres. Oops.

It also looks like 10 Marines got killed in an ambush by Iraqis pretending to surrender.

More worrisome, the same story related that a six-vehicle Army convoy was ambushed and destroyed after making a wrong turn. Several soldiers from that convoy were declared missing, and these soldiers may have been the ones displayed on Iraqi TV.

Iraq’s ambassador to the UN stated that the POWs would be treated humanely, in an apparent turnabout from previous statements:

"It is Iraqi official position, we will respect carefully the international humanitarian law, and the Geneva Convention," he said. "I hope that the American army will respect also this Geneva Convention because I hope that what is happening in Iraq now, both parties will respect international humanitarian law.

Now, it appears that the Iraqis may have executed several of the prisoners, according to both CNN and Fox News broadcasts I’m watching right now. The video shows the following:

The bodies, mostly still fully clothed but some with shirts pulled up, were shown on the floor in pools of blood. In the first room, at least two had wounds to the head, and another had a groin wound. In another room, an Iraqi uncovered more bodies, some with blackened faces.

I’m absolutely enraged. If this is true, then Iraq has violated the Geneva Conventions by 1) executing prisoners, 2) torturing prisoners during the course of interrogation, and 3) showing the prisoners on TV for propaganda purposes. Far as I’m concerned, it’s time for the gloves to come off. All the way off.

Several B-52s have taken off from an airbase in England. Level Tikrit, guys.

Update: And then there's bit by Ralph Peters:

In the end, all the Iraqi irregular forces are accomplishing is to make our troops more determined. The latest message I had from a friend serving in the war made it clear that our troops are enraged, not deterred, by Iraqi actions - not least by the execution in cold blood of American prisoners and the abuse of other POWs.


Posted 7:16 PM by Tony


An Orange County native trapped in the SF Bay Area. Email at orblog-at-yahoo.com.

Front page
Archive

Blogs


News
SF Chronicle
Washington Post
New York Post
New York Times
Opinion Journal
Yahoo News
National Post (Canada)
Globe and Mail (Canada)
Toronto Star (Canada)
Telegraph (UK)
International Herald Tribune (Europe)
Sydney Morning Herald (Australia)
Chosun Ilbo (Korea)
Korea Herald (Korea)
Fox News


Law
Legal Information Institute (Cornell)
Findlaw
US Patent and Trademark Office
Federal Judiciary
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals


Hobbies
Sluggy Freelance comic
Liberty Meadows comic
Day by Day comic
Penny Arcade comic
Real Life comic
The Man Show
Rathergood.com
Stick Figure Kung Fu
The Swing Session
The Bill Elliott Swing Orchestra
Sara Evans (country singer)
United States Naval Institute
Cato Institute
Baen book snippets
Baen forums
GameSpy
Dream Pod 9
Heavy Gear APA
Lindy in the Park (SF)
Northern California Lindy Society
Natch.net (swing dancing clips)
Lindy List (Bay Area swing dance calendar)
Nocturne.com (LA/OC swing dance calendar)


Site Credits

[Powered by Blogger]